The succession law of the Two Sicilies is
laid down in the Pragmatic Decree of Charles III of 1759, the laws on dynastic
marriages of 1829 and 1836, re-enforced in the Constitutions of 1848 and 1860.
The 1759 decree required that the Two Sicilies Crown pass by male primogeniture
among the descendants of Charles VII (III of Spain), being ceded first to his
3rd (2nd surviving) son Infante D. Ferdinand, and failing his male heirs, to
the descendants of each of his other sons (all Infants of Spain) in order of
birth, and failing them to the nearest female heiress of the last king. This
act was required under the treaties of Vienna of 1736 and Naples of 1759,
designed to preserve the European balance of power by separating the Spanish
and Italian sovereignties. If the Sovereignty of the Two Sicilies should be
combined with the Crown of Spain, the former was to be ceded to the next line immediately
after the Prince of the Asturias. Under the Pragmatic Decree of 1759, the entire
male line descendants of Charles III remained both Spanish and Two Sicilies
dynasts.
In 1830/33 mixed male priority succession
was reintroduced in Spain; under the terms of the 1834 and 1876 Constitutions,
all the descendants born of equal marriages of Francis I of the Two Sicilies
and Infanta Isabel, his 2nd wife, enjoyed a right of succession to
the Spanish Crown (thus including all the existing branches of the Two Sicilies
royal house descended from dynastic marriage). Renunciations of future succession
were prohibited by the Two Sicilies civil code (particular any renunciation
made as part of a contract of marriage), as well as the civil codes of Italy
and France. The Two Sicilies Crown could only be alienated in the event of the
combination of the Spanish and Two Sicilies sovereignties. In 1868 when Prince
Gaetano of the Two Sicilies (a younger brother of Francis II) married Infanta
Isabel (who was herself princess of Asturias following her brother, Alfonso
XII’s accession) in very similar circumstances to 1900, he was not required to
renounce, although a renunciation was drawn up for him to sign in the event
that his wife became Queen of Spain and he also inherited the headship of the
royal house.
The succession to the Grand Magistery of
the Constantinian Order, an ecclesiastical office hereditary in the House of
Farnese (and its heirs) by the Papal Brief Sincerae Fidei of 1699, and
the Bull Militantis Ecclesiae of 1718, must pass by male primogeniture. The
inheritance in 1731 by the immediate Farnese heir, Carlos de Borbón (later
Charles VII of Naples and III of Spain) was confirmed by the Pope in 1739. By a
separate act of 16 October 1759, Charles III declared his son Ferdinand “first
born legitimate Farnese” heir and as such Constantinian grand master (evidence
of the separate nature of the grand mastership); this was confirmed by the Pope
in 1763. An addition to the statutes of 1796 confirmed that in the person of
the King were two “distinct qualities” of King and Grand Master each governed
by their own laws. Hereditary
primogeniture succession in “the House of Bourbon as heirs of the Farnese” was
reconfirmed in the Statutes of 1934, with no mention of any exclusion or
renunciation.
On 7 January 1901 Prince Carlo of the Two
Sicilies, 2nd son of the Count of Caserta, Head of the Royal House
of the Two Sicilies, married Infanta Maria de las Mercedes, then heiress
presumptive to the Spanish Crown. The groom’s father, the Count of Caserta,
wrote to the Spanish Queen Regent (6 December 1900) that a renunciation of
future succession rights was not necessary and that only a renunciation of
nationality, under Spanish nationality law, was required; the Queen Regent
confirmed this in her reply of 10 December. Nonetheless, on 14 Dec 1900, he
required his son, Carlo, to sign the “Act of Cannes” in which he renounced the
“eventual succession” to the Crown of the Two Sicilies, promising to obey the
laws of the House in “execution of the Pragmatic Decree” of 1759. This Decree did
not in fact require a renunciation in the circumstances of 1900. The Spanish
government announced in the Cortes on 18 December 1900, and advised the Queen
Regent, that a renunciation of dynastic rights was unnecessary and would in any
case be illegal [there is no evidence that the government or queen regent was
even informed about the act of Cannes, of which there is no copy in any
official archives in Spain]. The concern that Carlo’s wife could become Queen
in the event of the death of her brother and the successions combined was obviated
by the birth of several children to King Alfonso XIII (the first in 1907). Prince
Carlo and his descendants appeared in every addition of the Almanach de Gotha (until it ceased
publication in 1944) under both Spain and the Two Sicilies, with no mention of
any renunciation or exclusion; these entries were all approved by the head of
the House.
In 1960, with the death of Prince Carlo’s
elder brother, Ferdinand, who had indicated his preference that his fourth
brother, Ranieri, succeed him, the succession was disputed between Carlo’s son Infante
Alfonso, and his uncle Ranieri. The former asserted that as primogeniture male
heir he succeeded under Two Sicilies law, the latter, Prince Ranieri, claimed
that the act of Cannes was a legal and valid complete and final dynastic
renunciation. Infante Alfonso was supported in his claim by the Count of
Barcelona, successor to Alfonso XIII, Infante D. Jaime, then head of the House
of Bourbon, by the then Duke of Parma and by the Duke of Braganza among other
Heads of Royal Houses. Prince Ranieri’s marriage to Carolina Zamoyska was
recognized as dynastic by his father but Alfonso XIII had refused to do so; their
son Ferdinand’s marriage was only recognized subsequently by the then head of
the House. Prince Charles of Bourbon is married to someone born of parents who were not capable of making a valid canonical mariage at the time; his wife's latefather was a convicted felon. His claimed titles are not
recognized by the King of Spain and his Order is not authorized to be worn in
Spain.
No comments:
Post a Comment